|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 05:10 PM EDT |
If software is obvious, why should one need to provide reams of source code or
working examples to file a patent application. Seems to me, a high level
description of the inventive software shows that the inventor posses the subject
of intellectual property. Once told what to do, mindless coding drones can just
whip up the source code....cause its obvious.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, October 20 2012 @ 05:29 AM EDT |
As I've said before, add two rules
1) The applicant must affirm that the patent HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED AND THEY
POSSESS A WORKING EXAMPLE.
2) That example MUST BE PRODUCED TO THE COURT should the patent owner sue over
it. With exceptions where the example has been accidentally destroyed etc etc.
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|