decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Early look at Windows 8 baffles consumers | 279 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
How to detect and remove AGPL packages?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 05:08 PM EDT
"Where I work currently AGPL has been forbidden by our Legal Team. Currently it is keeping us from going to 12.04 as from what we understand it is now in the standard ubuntu repos for 12.04. Here is my question how can one detect and remove those packages from one local repo (we do actually have our own internal ubuntu repo)?" ubuntuforum

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Viewed from abroad
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 05:08 PM EDT
f-secure offer some observations on Panetta's fears of a Cyber Pearl Harbor

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Well that was the simplest upgrade I have ever done :-)
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 06:49 PM EDT
Ubuntu xubuntu-desktop 12.04 to Ubuntu 12.10 Sweet :-)



---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Ubuntu 12.10 “Quantal Quetzal” takes flight with a bag full of Juju
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 07:05 PM EDT
Today, Canonical has released version 12.10 of its Ubuntu Linux distribution, codenamed "Quantal Quetzal" after a ridiculously awesome-looking bird.

Q uantal represents the start of a new two-year development cycle and lays the groundwork for what Ubuntu will evolve into by 2014. As such, the release is focused on figuring out what users are primarily doing on the desktop and in the enterprise and putting the right tools in front of them to help.

The release is right on schedule.

Lee Hutchinson, ars technica

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Dutch government gives itself the right to break into your computer and destroy it
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 01:06 AM EDT
"On 15 October, the Dutch ministry of Justice and Security proposed powers for the police to break into computers, install spyware, search computers and destroy data. These powers would extend to computers located outside the Netherlands.

Dutch digital rights movement Bits of Freedom warns for the unacceptable risks to cybersecurity and calls on other countries to strongly oppose the proposal."

Cory Doctorow, Boing Boing

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Nokia Q3 Results: misery all around
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 08:34 AM EDT

Tomi Ahonen gives us his analyses of Nokia's Q3 results, and it's not a pretty sight...

When Elop took over, Nokia had 33% market share in smartphones. Today it is 4%.

Q4 2010 - 29% (Elop first quarter in charge) Q1 2011 - 24% (Elop announces new strategy at start of quarter)
Q2 2011 - 16%
Q3 2011 - 14%
Q4 2011 - 12% (Windows based Lumia phones start to sell)
Q1 2012 - 8%
Q2 2012 - 7% (Microsoft 'Osbornes' Nokia's Lumia line)
Q3 2012 - 4%

In North America, total Nokia mobile phone sales fell in just one quarter from 700,000 to 300,000, Tomi reports. However, we have heard at least at one point the the Lumia was outselling the iPhone in China. The actual figures? In China Nokia sales fell in units 27% from 7.9 million to 5.8 million, but - the revenues crashed 49%.

This is a world-record fall in market share by any market leader in any industry, ever. Nokia generates a loss of 48.9% per smartphone it sells.

Next year Tomi says we can expect 2% or 3% for Nokia Lumia and Windows Phone 8 and definitely no more than 1% more from the other partners. I have read elsewhere that at this rate Nokia will run out of cash by March 14th.

My own opinion: The Win8 Phone is not going to gain traction any time soon. Consider: Microsoft already had their big launch for the Windows phone, with marching bands and rock shows in Time's Square - and all the glowing reports they could buy from their vast network of journalists. Once you have launched your product, you can't launch it again a year later. Nobody would pay any attention.

Then it turned out for the people who bought the Win 7.5 Phone that the whole time they were just beta testers for the Win 8 Phone. I wouldn't think they would have been too pleased when they learned that. Tomi says The Lumia series has had the biggest return rates of any smartphone model in Nokia's history. 4 in 10 Nokia Lumia owners in the only independent study of Lumia customer satisfaction, by Yankee Group, rated the Lumia smartphones the worst on the survey.

These Win 7.5 Phone customers will not likely being coming back for more. Worse than that for Microsoft, they will be talking about their unhappy experience with their friends, negative publicity that will undermine Microsoft's promotional efforts for not only the latest Win Phone, but also their new tablets. Anybody want to be a beta tester for the Surface?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Minnesota BANS Coursera - unenforceable law cited
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 11:17 AM EDT
Notice for Minnesota Users:

Coursera has been informed by the Minnesota Office of Higher Education that under Minnesota Statutes (136A.61 to 136A.71), a university cannot offer online courses to Minnesota residents unless the university has received authorization from the State of Minnesota to do so. If you are a resident of Minnesota, you agree that either (1) you will not take courses on Coursera, or (2) for each class that you take, the majority of work you do for the class will be done from outside the State of Minnesota.

Katherine Mangan, The Chronicle of Higher Education

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Off Topic
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 01:03 PM EDT

M otorola Must Offer Microsoft License To Standard Essential Patents at Court Rate

Motorola Inc. must agree to license standard- essential patents (SEPs) to Microsoft Corp., and if the parties cannot come to an agreement, a federal court will force one, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled Oct. 10 (Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., W.D. Wash., No. 2:10-cv-01823-JLR, 10/10/12).

This is the second loss for Motorola in this litigation in two weeks. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld Sept. 28 the same district court's decision to issue a preliminary anti-suit injunction, preventing Motorola from enforcing an injunction imposed by a German court against Xbox sales. 28. No. 12-35352, 2012 BL 257618 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2012).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Apple forced to pull back curtain on iPhone secrets
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 02:40 PM EDT
Judge Lucy Koh wants Apple to justify the massive dollar amount it sought to recoup from Samsung.

“In seeking the very large damages award it sought at trial, Apple stipulated to the introduction of JX1500, a partial summary of its damages calculations, which contains some product-specific unit sales and revenue information,” Judge Koh [.PDF] said in the filing. “As Apple appears to have realized in introducing that exhibit, it cannot both use its financial data to seek multi-billion dollar damages and insist on keeping it secret.”

Koh continued, “As this Court explained in the August 9 Order, Apple has not established that public availability of its product-specific unit sales, revenue, profit, profit margin, and cost data would actually provide its competitors with an advantage, as would be required to find the information sealable under the ‘compelling reasons’ standard.”

Zach Epstein, BGR

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Microsoft profit falls as pc sales shrink
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 02:50 PM EDT
With PC makers and analysts increasingly skeptical that the new Windows 8 operating system will lure consumers away from tablets and smartphones, Microsoft said Thursday that declining sales pushed down its net income 22 percent in the latest quarter.

The Salt Lake Tribune

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Long Reach Of US Extradition
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 20 2012 @ 07:29 AM EDT
"Should foreign governments give up their nationals to the US to 'face justice' over minor crimes committed outside US borders? What about in civil matters, like copyright infringement? Kellie Tranter on America's thirst for extradition" link

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Early look at Windows 8 baffles consumers
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 20 2012 @ 11:25 AM EDT
The release of Microsoft's Windows 8 operating system is a week away, and consumers are in for a shock. Windows, used in one form or another for a generation, is getting a completely different look that will force users to learn new ways to get things done.

Early look at Windows 8 baffles consumers

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )