|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 05:11 AM EDT |
Well, good luck to them trying that remotely for anyone with any sense. Secure
OSs are available for free these days.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: PJ on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 11:23 AM EDT |
Aren't they just asking for powers to do what they
already are doing? Wasn't there a story last week
or so about the German government doint exactly
that?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Wol on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 06:56 PM EDT |
Reading the actual proposal, various people have accused Cory of going over the
top.
Firstly, a Judge's warrant is required (unlike they're angling for in certain
other jurisdictions ...)
Secondly, and I couldn't make this out for sure, I think a Judges warrant from
the same jurisdiction as the computer's location is required WHERE POSSIBLE.
So basically, point 2 says they have to go their Dutch judge and say "we
cannot geolocate our target computer, can we dispense with the other
warrant".
As I say, I could be wrong on point 2, but that seems to me perfectly
reasonable.
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
