decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
And the Court is in MS's backyard.... | 279 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
And the Court is in MS's backyard....
Authored by: deck2 on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 02:02 PM EDT
Does that mean it is in MS's backpocket? Hopefully not, however Motorola needs
to appeal since MS is trying to use the courts to bully others.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Is this very bad news?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 02:35 PM EDT
Didn't Moto go to the FTC to prohibit import to US of the alleged
offending devices? The US court could then presume to itself
powers in respect of the RAND license terms in the US. The German
issue only came up after MS dragged its feet in the US, and it will
still have to be settled in Germany. Note also that the German
court already has the power to set the terms if parties don't
agree. The US judge may have done some reading.

In a perfect world the party from country A and the party from country
B (where B=A is a possibility) would sit down at a table in country C,
and negotiate a worldwide rate between themselves. Not likely in
the instant case as the parties could best be described in language
that fits GL's comments policy, as belligerent. So we end up with
piecemeal lawsuits and multifarious patent licenses in every market.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

This might be a solution
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 04:49 PM EDT
If the court sets the patent rates for everyone and not just Motorola this might
be the solution to patent disputes.

Maybe a system like they have for music where the money gets taken by the
industry suits and non gets to the musicians.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

WSJ: Google may settle mobile FRAND patent antitrust claim
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, October 19 2012 @ 11:02 PM EDT

Man - Google is the shaft...

One of the sources noted that the FTC had threatened to bring a case against Google over alleged unfair business practices involving the use of Motorola's IP against rival mobile device makers like Apple and Microsoft. During discussions, the agency's lawyers cited a number of cases in which the Google subsidiary possibly violated FRAND terms.

Google reportedly argued that competitors currently holding FRAND patents also violated their duties in bringing suit against Motorola and others, including filings from Apple. The company went on to say that if a settlement was reached, it would be left defenseless as rivals push forward with their own FRAND claims.

Just what I said above!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

This is very bad news!
Authored by: Wol on Saturday, October 20 2012 @ 06:13 AM EDT
One hopes ...

Firstly the Judge used the word "may".

Secondly, the Judge used the words "honest dispute" - hopefully Google
will point out that MS have simply refused to negotiate, therefore there is no
dispute ... :-)

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )