|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 04:28 AM EDT |
That's a weird statement. It says you can't offer a warrenty on GPL code.
Now I know that warrenties are unheard of in software, but it still seems
strange.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 05:19 PM EDT |
"This all feels like lawyers digging a deeper hole."
All the way to China they are...
Really, really stupid on their part when you contemplate it.
It's sort of a hint when <b><i>Verizon</i></b> *CAVES*
on a GPL compliance issue like they did with busybox- they've got the resources
to field lawyers that could conceivably knock holes in the license. They opted
to settle for quite a bit more than the lawyers would've cost them. Same with
Actiontec.
The reality is...you don't need cash for remuneration for a derivative
works/publication license to be in effect or for you to be held liable to it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|