|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 17 2012 @ 02:26 PM EDT |
Actually, I'm not sure where Twin Peaks is denying any points
of law. In denying most of paragraph 33, they're denying
dicta (non-binding statments by the court). They're also
denying some of Red Hat's generalizations and conclusions
("FOSS is widely recognized...")[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, October 17 2012 @ 02:31 PM EDT |
You got it. It is just another attack from
another angle. What makes the entire
situation so intolerable is that legally,
the darkside is allowed to attack with proxy
companies. There is no penalty for the
puppermasters behind the scenes.
Until they are trapped in the conspiracy.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 17 2012 @ 03:40 PM EDT |
Old legal saw:
When the facts are against you pound on the law.
When the law is against you pound on the facts.
When both the facts and the law are against you pound on the table.
It sounds to me like Twin Peaks intends to pound on the table.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
