|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 16 2012 @ 11:20 PM EDT |
If the filings about juror instructions were sealed, Samsung wouldn't have been
able to publicly complain about it, probably. But I'm still a bit surprised that
someone else hasn't raised the issue before now. Maybe it's a matter that there
was so much else to complain about.
I find it hard to believe that there is any justification for keeping those
filings sealed now that the jury trial is over. Samsung probably doesn't have
much incentive to push to be able to argue about it publicly now, though. The
juror misconduct issue is a more central problem that is probably much more
important. OTOH, I wouldn't be surprised to see it raised in any appeal.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Sealed --> Samsung gagged - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 17 2012 @ 07:43 AM EDT
- Retraction - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 18 2012 @ 08:05 PM EDT
|
|
|
|