|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 16 2012 @ 12:32 AM EDT |
Point taken.
Thanks for the compelling explanations. Your point being, if I understood
correctly, that content can provide an enhanced user experience just as much as
content managing algorithms or other such machine modifications.
When viewing the patent issue, a valid argument can be raised about why one type
of enhancement reserves patent protection whereas the other does not.
If someone where to examine how software/algorithms can be made to resemble
behavior with more resemblances to decision making or perhaps be classified as
useful to a user because of a level of automated assistance in task related
operations/function, how would you proceed to deconstruct those differences?
I'm interested in a valid challenge to my thesis that software modifies the
characteristics of the entire computer system, in a way that the computer
operator finds useful. I mention this because it is the core concept I find
compelling in the acceptance of software patents.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|