decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
OK, agreed in part | 758 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
OK, agreed in part
Authored by: stegu on Monday, October 15 2012 @ 04:13 AM EDT
OK. I fully understand your lack of time.
Many of us are in the same situation, and
many people appreciate your taking the time
to do this. The many comments should tell you
that there is great interest in what you wrote.

I just meant that it is often wise to follow the
advice of an editor with knowledge of your target
audience taking a fresh look. You must have had
positive experiences with that before as well.
If not, I must have been unusually lucky with
the editors I have encountered. True, not all
suggestions or opinions I have had from editors
have been useful, but most of them have been
relevant and worth listening to, and they have
all improved on what I wrote in some way.

The OP comment stood out among the rest, and I
think the advice is worth following when we
communicate with lawyers and the general public.
Writing something to meet your target audience
more than halfway is hard, but the effort spent
on the authoring side is a lot less than the
combined effort that has to be spent on the
readers' side if the piece is not accessible
to them, and a lot of readers will just give up
on reading, or misunderstand what you write.
You saw some of that even in comments here on
Groklaw.

Yes, readers have to make an effort to understand,
and difficult subjects require more effort,
but anything the author can do to reduce that
effort is a good thing, and good communication
goes to great lengths to focus on its target.

The combined skill and brainpower on Groklaw is
impressive. Perhaps we should set up a community
authoring framework (a simple wiki would suffice)
to perform tasks like "edit this piece for clarity
to make it more accessible to an audience of
lawyers"? While a formal role as an editor would
be far beyond my skills, I would gladly take part
in such an effort, on whatever limited spare time
I have.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • OK, agreed in part - Authored by: PJ on Monday, October 15 2012 @ 06:05 AM EDT
    • besides... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 15 2012 @ 01:24 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )