decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Nope! | 758 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Nope!
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 14 2012 @ 08:30 AM EDT
A rectangular block is a mathematical concept. However,
arranging a lot of such rectangular blocks to create an
aesthetically pleasing and comfortable place to live is not
simply mathematics - there is creative content (and not just
artistic content) there. It is exactly the same with
software.

The problem with software patents is that patents are being
granted in some cases for the mathematical principles and
algorithms - the geometric shape of the bricks by analogy,
and also the way in which the bricks are arranged.

The question is this - would you be allowed to patent the
use of a pattern of bricks such as "a straight line and a
right angle return between two curved sections"? The answer
is no - because the purpose of bricks is so that you can lay
them out into different arrangements, so that even if nobody
has used that arrangement before, the fact that you can have
various combinations of straights, curves, and corners is
obvious, and is not therefore an invention but rather is a
creative expression. Why then are patents being granted for
the quivalent of this in software?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )