Making marks on paper with a pencil ...
OK, then
how about substituting "transmitting the question to a fifteenth
dimension in
hyperspace using a hypernomium-436 isotope at a
temperature not greater than
246.76 degrees Kelvin and reading the return
marks containing the answer
through a dilithium crystal doped with carbon-
13 ions?"
Again, your answer
is not helpful because it assumes as irrefutable fact
that once one method is
found to do something, there is nothing that can
be done within the realm of
patentable subject matter to improve it, and/or,
by definition(!!!), the
improvement cannot be patentable
subject matter.
And that's just
plain silly. If it's not patentable, it is much easier to
explain that it is
either known or obvious, without resorting to this kind of
sophistry. We can
also explain planetary and stellar movements by
reference to the earth being a
stationary object at the center of the
universe, but, just like the patentable
subject matter debates, the rule is
going to have to be modified to account
individually for every object under
consideration and the whole system will
eventually collapse under its own
complexity. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|