decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
"retail counter" | 758 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
If Wiley want to control the market
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 14 2012 @ 10:20 PM EDT
I doubt what he is doing is illegal in a supposedly free market,
but I would allow a question of morality. Who is immoral,
this guy or Wiley?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

If Wiley want to control the market
Authored by: Gringo_ on Monday, October 15 2012 @ 12:19 AM EDT

If this student bought and imported them specifically for resale, then I'm sorry but what he did IS probably illegal, and the publisher has every right to be aggrieved.

What law would he be breaking? AFAIK, when you buy something, it is yours, and you can do what you want with it. Isn't that so? Every year, students sell the text books they don't need anymore. Is that wrong? What if I grab up some books on a promotional sale, knowing where I could resell them at a small discount yet still make a small profit - would you object to my entrepreneurship? What if I am a resident in your country, but I regularly travel back to my home country and when there, stock up on a few things, including books, that my friends and fellow expatriates back in your country requested. Would that be wrong? Then finally, what if I buy a lot of books and sell them on eBay? I don't get where, in your opinion, I crossed the line and why.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Purchasing for resale is legal.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 15 2012 @ 03:45 AM EDT
    Always has been, probably always will be.

    First sale doctrine. If Wiley doesn't want the student doing it, they have the
    option of not selling to him.

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    "retail counter"
    Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 15 2012 @ 07:24 AM EDT
    My definition of that is any sale that is not under a pre-
    arranged contract limiting the buyer's use of the product.

    Not being a lawyer, I am confused about when copyright law
    expanded into the distribution industry. What is a good
    place to start reading about that?

    --

    Bondfire

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )