decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
haha | 379 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Nathan Myhrvold's Cunning Plan to Prevent 3-D Printer Piracy
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 02:33 PM EDT
This cannot possibly work

Even if they do manage to get a law passed that every manufacturing devices
include such a capability, it's trivial to modify a physical object (and
therefor the plans to build it) in a way that is completely unnoticeable to even
careful inspection, but makes the plans not match the digital fingerprint.

if you are doing a sneaker, just move the logo 1/100 of an inch and the
signature will no longer match

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

venturing off topic into the far future ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 04:03 PM EDT
What will be the reward system when things can be duplicated trivially and at
will? Let us ignore the "end of poverty" train of thought for a
moment. How will society reward the smart or artistic creators of things that
get copied?

One could take the RIAA/MPAA position and prevent this from ever happening.
Just outlaw or brutally restrict copying devices. Myhrvold's invention fits in
here.

Humans have come from hunter-gatherers, through the stone age, bronze age,
industrial age, information age ... what next? The age of enforced poverty?

But back to the reward. Everything is copyable. What can you give someone who
can have almost everything already?

Fame.
Land.
Respect.
Potable water.
Access to breeding females.
First in line for new adventures, like space travel.
Something like the military, where every good mission is rewarded by a harder
and more dangerous job.

What else is there?

--

Bondfire
sorry to offend, i read about the assassination attempt on a 14 year old girl
that promotes girls going to school. i am very cynical today.

in the 1980s there was a book that brushed against this subject, Voyage to
Yesteryear by James Hogan

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

haha
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 05:45 PM EDT
a patent for not paying ....how novel

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )