|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 08:03 PM EDT |
lol - as if anyone could really misconstrue "each of a plurality"
The word 'each' has one and only one meaning in this context.
It's actually a truncation of the phrase 'each and every one' of a plurality.
'and every one' is dutifully implied in this context.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 12:31 AM EDT |
I would like to see what Apple said in their motion to Judge Koh. It would seem
odd that Koh would pluck a word out of one phrase and insert it in another
seeing it that way in Apple's briefing.
Perhaps, though, was it a mistake by Judge Koh (or Judge Koh's clerk) working
too quickly? In that case, one of the many Apple lawyers should have caught it.
If they knew it was a mistake, but pretended otherwise, would that result in the
"at best" language?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 13 2012 @ 10:43 PM EDT |
"We thought". Yeah, Judge Prost - who is writing this ruling
for the panel - was also on ResQNet. PJ was asking "What are the odds?" about V.
Hogan having been sued by the husband of a partner at Quinn Emanuel... Well,
"small world syndrome" has struck Apple again.
Well, it
says, "Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges." Those are all
different people. All four have separate Wikipedia pages, for
example.
People should look at page 1382 there and see what it says
there. No wonder Judge Prost said "is—at best—incorrect!" You just can't misread
it the way Apple interpreted it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
