decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Link | 379 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Link
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 10:09 PM EDT
The Three Pillars of Nokia Strategy

The Preview button is your friend ;-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Three Pillars of Nokia Strategy= Larry Moe, and Ballmer joe
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 11:07 PM EDT
The Three Pillars of Nokia Strategy.
LOL.
New Windows 8 name Windows8Nokia

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Symbian was winning?"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 11:11 PM EDT
I agree with the basic premise that the MS bet was a huge mistake, but
suggesting that symbian would have kept up with what android has done is hard to
agree with (iOS to a lesser extent because in some regards it's gone
backwards!).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Three Pillars of Nokia Strategy - Have All Failed. Why Nokia Must Fire CEO Elop Now
Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 11:42 PM EDT

Wow - I just spent what seems like an hour (while multitasking, anyhow) reading not only the blog but every single comment. In the forum there were some clearly knowledgeable people.

So anyhow, two theories have emerged in my mind...

1.) Microsoft seduced the Nokia board, telling them anything they wanted to hear to win their hearts and minds. Microsoft had one goal - to win. If Nokia could pull off success with the Windows phone, that would have been fine with Microsoft. If they couldn't, Microsoft would at least have taken them out. One down, one to go - Android.

In this scenario with Nokia, I see absolutely callus, cold-blooded, ruthless, even Machiavellian strategy at work.

Nokia didn't work out, as far as the Windows phone goes, and it's not going to, at least in the short term - soon enough to save Nokia. So I see this same Microsoft strategy team reading a blog like Tom's and laughing at how they destroyed Nokia - at what a chump Nokia was, how they took the bait, at how board at Nokia must be sweating now, at how they must wake up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat...

2.) One of the commenters mentioned some board members with more money invested in Microsoft stock than they had in Nokia. This is something we have speculated on here at Groklaw, but I think it's a stretch. There was no source to back up such a proposition. If it was true, I am sure there are laws against that kind of thing. Anyhow, this scenario ends with the Microsoft strategy team and these influential Nokia board members going out for drinks together and holding their glasses high while they watch Nokia sinking like the Titanic in the sunset.

I favour my first theory. It is perfectly in keeping with what we know about the nature of Microsoft, and with their strategy to kill Google and Android. Taking out Nokia was important too. Though now that Nokia is crippled and mortally wounded and doesn't look like much of a threat to anybody, it must have looked very different back when plans were first laid.

Finally, here I will add a comment only vaguely related in this Nokia thread. I was very, very upset to read about Microsoft's attacks on Google Maps in the Newspicks. The cold war Microsoft has been waging against Android has just heated up and gone thermonulear. They are ready now to wage full scale war against Android/Google, and now Google has to fight nuclear war on two fronts at the same time, Apple and Microsoft. I have no doubt there has been collaboration between those two. As PJ noted, the timing reveals it. As soon as Apple freed themselves from Google Maps, Microsoft moved in for the attack.

I would just like to warn these two, Apple and Microsoft. You think you are so clever, but you better think twice. Google/Android are not alone. They have a multitude behind them - ordinary every day people, by the millions. You got a taste of what these people can do when you saw how fast SOPA and its cousin PIPA where destroyed. We can destroy you too. We are legion.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Completely wrong
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT
There's a fatal flaw in his starting assumption... "The Three Pillars of
Nokia Strategy"

The flaw is that Nokia has no strategy. This is Microsoft's strategy, and the
success of Nokia does not figure into it. Elop is doing exactly what he is paid
to do, and his bosses are not going to fire him for it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )