|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 12:17 AM EDT |
There is a possibility that it is a simple mistake, I suppose. I just put
something in the corrections thread suggesting replacing "appeal" with
"case".[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 12:34 AM EDT |
If so, that would probably be the first part of the remaining fight. But it
would still be back at the district court, wouldn't it?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 09:50 AM EDT |
Afaict it's only the order banning sale of the Nexus that
was reversed. The stuff that is still the subject of the
appeal (all the goodies in the 'Likelihood of Success' bit)
haven't been reversed - never mind revered - but apparently
aren't likely to survive the appeal.
Having said that, I don't get the bit about judicial
economy. That it is more economical to flag your expected
result now and deliver it later than to just deliver it
later doesn't make much sense to me - unless it's so's the
lawyers can prepare their appeals to the appeals[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
