|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 10:51 AM EDT |
Afaict it's only the order banning sale of the Nexus that
was
reversed. The stuff that is still the subject of the
appeal (all the goodies in
the 'Likelihood of Success' bit)
haven't been reversed - never mind revered -
but apparently
aren't likely to survive the appeal.
I think the
only think appealed was the order. The "'Likelihood of Success' bit" was just
part of the rationale for the order. That became moot when Federal Circuit Court
decided that the patent wasn't necessarily relevant to people choosing to buy
the phone.
I think I understand the "judicial economy" part. The trial
next year will involve whether or not Samsung violated the patent. The court
will need to make sure that Apple doesn't misrepresent what the patent means, as
they did in this appeal. Otherwise, Samsung would just appeal the results and
the appeals court would have to overturn the jury's verdict.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: tknarr on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 12:40 PM EDT |
I suspect it's the Appeals Court saying to the judge "That there was enough
for the R&R, but we noticed this other major error you made. Just to be
clear: it's an error. We expect you not to make it this time around, and we'll
be really unhappy if you waste our time on another R&R.". [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- R&R = ? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 05:54 PM EDT
- Nevermind! (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 12 2012 @ 08:23 PM EDT
|
|
|
|
