decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
FUNDS are an abstract construct in the first place | 277 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
FUNDS are an abstract construct in the first place
Authored by: darrellb on Tuesday, October 09 2012 @ 05:51 PM EDT
The funds in my bank account are not abstract.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

FUNDS are an abstract construct in the first place
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10 2012 @ 06:42 AM EDT
Yes. Manipulation of funds is math - and has been since at
least 1445, when Pacioli described double-entry bookkeeping.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

FUNDS are an abstract construct in the first place
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 10 2012 @ 12:34 PM EDT
And yet, I've paid for a house with such an "abstraction" by
"wiring the funds". No one wrote any physical check; no one showed up
with a suitcase of cash. But, the house was purchased just the same.

This argument is silly. You can turn these "abstractions" into
physical dollars if you want.

But, the truth is, most of the time, most money is not in tangible form. So
what? It isn't any less real.

Moreover, you can turn your balance into cash whenever you like. So, it's sheer
sophistry to pretend there is something "mathematical" or even
"abstract" about one's bank balance or manipulating it in the
computer. Manipulating one's balance is entirely equivalent, in the real world,
to counting out physical money.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )