decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
not a leader in IP litigation, either | 190 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
translation:
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 04:29 AM EDT
1, 2 & 3: Copy what Google and Apple are doing.

4: Keep trying to get our monopoly back.

5: We'll think of something new for ourselves. We really mean it this time!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • translation: - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 12:39 PM EDT
    • translation: - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 08:03 PM EDT
not a leader in IP litigation, either
Authored by: mcinsand on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 11:50 AM EDT
So far, the only innovations I have seen in IP litigation have been from Apple.
MS copies as best they can, but Apple is the real innovator in IP thuggery.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

#4 is a hoot
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 05:59 PM EDT
Hmmm...

"...one platform, Windows, across the PC, tablet, phone, server and
cloud..."

Since Winders has made little or no headway in tablets and phones, is losing
ground in PCs and servers, and barely treading water in the cloud, this looks
like someone is smoking something.


"...to drive a thriving ecosystem of developers..."

Oh... they're moving to Linux?


"...unify the cross-device user experience..."

There are different devices for a reason. Trying to 'unify' too many
experiences into Windows is what started the decline. Doing many things badly
never competes against doing a few things well.

"...increase agility when bringing new advancements to market."

Seems to me, one of the reasons M$ is facing so many competing OSes in the
mobile space is specifically the lack of agility in Windows.


What this should be is a warning to all M$ 'partners'... "All your bases
are belong to us!"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )