decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The challenge | 190 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The challenge
Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 10:40 AM EDT
How about someone writing a Groklaw post describing, in detail, a historical case in which a patent clearly helped an inventor to bring something to market, where the patent protected him while he provided value to society, and where the patent-holder's mononopoly clearly did not impede the development and deployment of his invention while it was in force.
Trevor_Baylis is a lone inventor who patented his wind-up radio to protect it and made it available to spread information about aids in Africa. Africans who were poor or lived in outlying districts could not get the batteries to keep their radios working.

There are loads of updated wind-up radios, torches and the like available for sale. However, they use rechargeable batteries. The Baylis invention never needs batteries, at all.

I think the Baylis example meets the terms of the challenge. I happen to disagree with his view that the lone inventor is protected by patents. However, he got the radios out to Africa at an affordable price for the people who needed it.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )