decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not broad enough | 190 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Innovation in Patents
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 12:30 PM EDT

Here's an interesting idea. It would cost quite a bit to set up, but it might
be worth it. Set up a non-profit to

1) Start taking old patents and effectively adding "on a touch screen"
or "on the internet" or "on a portable computing device" or
"on a mobile network" to them and refiling them.

2) When the patents start issuing (you know they will), start filing law suits
against patent happy companies in the rocket docket jurisdictions. This would
have the effect of clogging up the pro-patent court systems and hopefully
forcing the companies involved to go to congress and demand change.

Of course I think I've just describe what every patent troll does. So I guess
we just have to wait for all these companies to demand change. I won't hold my
breath.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not broad enough
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 11 2012 @ 05:14 PM EDT
How about:

Method for de-abstraction of algorithmic processes by semantic tranformation of
procedural descriptors linguistically integrated into revised descriptors
utilizing distributed networking terminology.

There, that ought to cover just about anything under the sun...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )