decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
EMI Admits DRM Does Not Work | 168 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
EMI Admits DRM Does Not Work
Authored by: MadTom1999 on Saturday, October 06 2012 @ 04:12 AM EDT
I gave up buying digital media on disk when, here in the UK, they stopped
accepting returns in case I might have copied it.
Any other industry tries to sell you absolute shit and their in trouble.
I now estimate this policy has cost the music industry ~£30,000 in possible
sales from me, and the film industry maybe £5,000.
Mind you the musicians haven’t lost a 10th of that - I go see some when I can.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

EMI Admits DRM Does Not Work
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, October 07 2012 @ 07:17 PM EDT
> Despite them saying: "Own it now..." they actually mean:
"Rent it now..." but you get to keep the bit of plastic without having
to worry about returning it to a rental store, but not knowing when the rental
period is going to end.

In whatever Federal District the Denver Federal Appeals is in, "Own it
now" can be legally construed to mean that your purchase of the item
included all rights inherent within the production. IOW, Hollywood just sold you
the copyright to the audio, video, and images on the DVD, or whatever format one
purchased.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

They want it both ways
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 08 2012 @ 11:18 AM EDT
The contracts with the artists say that by licensing the music the artists get
more of the money, so on the books the recording companies "sell" the
music. If they sell it, the first sale doctrine comes into play so to the
consumer, it's licensed. I think that the line is blurred enough by the
recording companies that we should call it what ever we want. ;)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )