|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 05 2012 @ 03:20 PM EDT |
And the only conclusion one can draw from it is that your of the opinion that
a sigmoidal measurement/processing is mutually exclusive of 2 dimensional
processing.
I disagree and present the following interest payment process
to prove why 2 dimensional processing is not mutually exclusive of a sigmoidal
curve:
1) Use the principal to identify the interest to be
calculated
2) Calculate the interest as applied to the principal
3)
Pay the interest into the principal
4) Repeat at step one
Where the
rules applied are:
1) A cap on the total interest paid for a time frame
exists (such as $1 million in 1 year)
2) The interest rate to pay will
decrease at certain rates as the principal to calculate on increases - in other
words, you pay less interest on top of both the interest and principal at larger
armounts
3) The interest will be calculated daily
Measuring that by
the interest paid daily identifying the values by the whole cent and starting
with a small principal could easily chart out to a sigmoidal curve
where:
initially the same interest is paid each day from one day to the
next
the interest to be paid for the next day starts to change from the
previous day
the gap between the two day period for interest paid and
the total interest to pay increases with an expanding rate
when the
larger amounts of total principal are reached, the interest to be paid starts
decreasing
causing the daily interest gap to be paid between one day
and the next to decrease
2 dimensional processing and sigmoidal curves are
not mutually exclusive. One can hardly claim the process identified in steps 1
through 4 can not reasonably be viewed as being binary in nature. Apply the
process in a step = Length, move from one step to the next = Width. Length +
Width without height = 2 dimensions.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|