decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Can Apple get "Koh-burned" for this? | 336 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Can Apple get "Koh-burned" for this?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 08 2012 @ 12:59 AM EDT
AS a former word processor for a large law firm, I can tell you that many if not
most courts have rules specifying font size, line spacing and margin size that
must be adhered to.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Can Apple get "Koh-burned" for this?
Authored by: JonCB on Monday, October 08 2012 @ 01:44 AM EDT
Looking at Samsung's complaint, it's not really that simple.

Samsung's point is that what Apple have done is made some
broad sweeping statement without any argument and then
argued the points in the supporting declarations. They
believe that Judge Koh's order was requiring them to make
the argument, citing relevant evidence, and then reference
the supporting documentation so that you can fact check the
context.

To be honest i'm more interested in the fact that the
rebuttal from Apple is summed up as "they should have said
something earlier". I expected a paragraph proclaiming that
they have abided by both the letter and the spirit of the
order, every argument they wish to rely upon is contained
within the motion and the supporting declarations provide
corroboration.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Can Apple get "Koh-burned" for this?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, October 09 2012 @ 01:23 AM EDT
This is how I grade papers. When I say 1000 words, I read
1000 words +/- maybe 30 words. I draw a red line on the page
and write my mark below it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )