decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Yes, I'd like to see a retraction | 751 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Yes, I'd like to see a retraction
Authored by: PJ on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 06:49 PM EDT
There will be no retraction. The article is
correct as it is.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Your "quote" of the transcript was a paraphrase besides being wrong.
Authored by: artp on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 11:29 PM EDT

So take a look in the mirror if you want to see who should be printing a retraction.

The original poster wrote:

"He was asked 'have any of you ever been involved in A legal case'."

Your response started out with "Agreed." So I take your agreement as agreement with his points. Agreed?

The question from the transcript was

"The next question is, have you or a family member or someone very close to you ever been involved in a lawsuit, either as a plaintiff, a defendant, or as a witness?"

That isn't what the original poster wrote, nor is it what you agreed with. You are off base right off the bat. When accusing others of lying, it is best to check your facts first.

Notice in reading the transcripts that Hogan was not shy about speaking and speaking and speaking, unlike the other jurors. He had plenty of opportunity to put in a word that he was involved in MORE than one suit.

Here's how another juror answered the patent question:

THE COURT: Okay. All right. Thank you. Let's go, I think, to ms. Halim, Mr. Okamoto, and Mr. Hogan. You raised your hands. Okay. let's please start with Ms. Halim.

PROSPECTIVE JUROR: Okay. I have two patents. One is issued when I was at weitek, also I.C. Design. Another one was at silicon graphics.

See how she gave the full answer first, then addressed the details? It works very well in getting all the necessary facts out.

Now since some people of trollish tendency have taken to stretching word meanings, let's take a look at what dictionary.com says about all this.

ev·er   [ev-er]

1. at all times; always: an ever-present danger; He is ever ready to find fault.

2. continuously: ever since then.

3. at any time: Have you ever seen anything like it?

4. in any possible case; by any chance; at all (often used to intensify or emphasize a phrase or an emotional reaction as surprise or impatience): How did you ever manage to do it? If the band ever plays again, we will dance.

Definitions 1 & 2 don't match this case. Definitions 3 & 4 both match this useage. They both are comprehensive.

Of course, 4 leads us back to that ephemeral word "any":

an·y   [en-ee]

1. one, a, an, or some; one or more without specification or identification: If you have any witnesses, produce them. Pick out any six you like.

2. whatever or whichever it may be: cheap at any price.

3. in whatever quantity or number, great or small; some: Do you have any butter?

4. every; all: Any schoolboy would know that. Read any books you find on the subject.

5. (following a negative) at all: She can't endure any criticism.

Definition 1 would fit, except the judge didn't specify a quantity, so that is out. 2 and 3 are specific about a certain quantity. 5 doesn't apply because there was no negative in the judge's example. So 4 would apply: every or all. What part of "all" don't you understand?

---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley sinks ?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )