|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 03:18 AM EDT |
Yes, we don't know which partner's wife saw this, when they found out (and as
you say, it was probably after, when he started going on shows).
Hogan himself is trying to blame Samsung for knowing, but waiting. Talk about
admitting guilt, but trying to shift blame![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 04:38 AM EDT |
Agreed. I have no idea who anyone on the jury is except for Mr. Hogan and I
only learned about him after seeing him give interview after interview after
interview. So I'm absolutely not surprised that they only learned of this after
the fact.
And given that this guy is giving out interviews containing recollections about
the questions he was asked that do not match the official transcript, well,
let's just say that someone has some explaining to do. Because if he's going to
claim that he doesn't have a chip on his shoulder, he's got an awfully funny way
of showing it. And he's got no one else to blame for giving all those
interviews.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 03:48 PM EDT |
If you check the dates on the litigation relating to Hogan vs. Seagate, you may
notice that those dates are nearly twenty years ago.
How many attorneys do you suppose would remember a minor case, and one that,
apparently, did not even involve patents, which would probably have been the
focus of those involved in the voir dire? It is probable that Mr. Hogan's case
did not even enter the attorney's mind until after Hogan's interviews, which, as
we know, are what started all this furor.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
