|
|
|
| Authored by: PJ on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 01:29 PM EDT |
You know, right, that we have quite a few of the
PDFs and you can find them in the Oracle v. Google
Timeline page. The trial started April 17 or 18,
so just go to the date.
We stopped when we were paying hundreds of dollars,
so there's a bit of a delay now, but there are many,
many more already here as PDFs that I just didn't
get to write about. Also, I have them script-morphed
into HTML, but the headers need some editing. IF
you'd like to help me do that, I'd be so grateful.
Anyone.
Just let me know which one you want to do, ideally
sequentially, and I'll give you a url for the script-done
version.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 02:27 PM EDT |
That was certainly not intended to belittle you or your efforts - just some
irony directed at the situation.
Tonight I'll look over your cache of PDFs - some stuff I have been doing at work
might prove useful in making that faster. Can't promise results, but I can
promise the effort.
cpeterson
P.S. - Can Samsung get a review of their other appealed issues if the verdict is
overturned on jury misconduct? Would the appeals court just do a "didn't
need to reach those issues"?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
