decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Samsung's Claims of Juror Misconduct Revealed in Unredacted Filings ~pj Updated | 751 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Samsung's Claims of Juror Misconduct Revealed in Unredacted Filings ~pj Updated
Authored by: tknarr on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 06:06 PM EDT

When I was in, there wasn't any "so help me God", it was just "I swear". As for what happens if you can't so swear, the judge just dismisses you. Your answer would likely get you in trouble with the judge, though, since the court doesn't in fact bar you from telling the whole truth. It just won't let you go wandering afield, you have to answer the question being asked. There's a line between a question that's phrased so that you can answer truthfully and completely but there's still relevant information that wasn't asked for, vs. a question for which there exists no completely truthful answer. Eg.:

"How many lawsuits have you been a plaintiff in?". If you've been a defendant in 10 lawsuits but never the plaintiff, you can answer "None." and be stating the whole truth. The question is incomplete, but your answer isn't. I'd feel comfortable answering that question as phrased.

"Did you prevail or lose in your lawsuit against X?". You've never sued X. This is one where there's no completely truthful answer, all possible answers include the false statement that you did sue X. This is where I'd turn to the judge with "I can't give a truthful answer to that question, how would you like me to proceed?". The judge's first question's going to be "Why can't you?", which gives me leave to tell him why, and now it's a race between me answering the judge and the questioning attorney withdrawing the question.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Samsung's Claims of Juror Misconduct Revealed in Unredacted Filings ~pj Updated
Authored by: Wol on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 06:14 PM EDT
Well, standard UK practice (unless it's changed, I don't think so), is to swear
on the bible.

Strangely enough, a lot of Christians refuse to swear on the bible because it
itself tells them they mustn't! :-)

But there are a whole bunch of workarounds to this (can't tell you what they
are), because of devout Christians, other faiths, no faith at all, etc etc.

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )