|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 02:16 PM EDT |
i really want to agree with you but i dont see how you can say that when the
question never asked for it. IMO its failure on the court's side for not asking
them to list all cases they were involved in bc that is exactly how it should be
but they didnt. This article is incredibly misleading by saying that the court
asked to list all, cites a document, and the document does not follow the
assertion of the writer, see quote in above comment. and you cant blame Hogan
for being untruthful when he answered the question that was asked "Have you
ever." If he had said "once, in 2008" then his answer would have
been untruthful.
As a lawyer you should know that the contexts of questions means everything and
the court failed to make sure their question was not ambiguous.
Now if someone could quote or link to me where the court says list all cases
involved, then i will agree completely that he was untruthful and knowingly hid
background information on himself[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|