|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 01:41 AM EDT |
The "half ass question", as you put it, was posed by the judge, not a
lawyer. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: AndyC on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 08:26 AM EDT |
| What part of 'have you ever' is half assed? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: cjk fossman on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 08:49 AM EDT |
Read PJ's comments policy
here. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: miltonw on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 01:16 PM EDT |
It is very, very clear from standard instructions from the judge that it is the
potential juror's responsibility to disclose any personal bias, any
connections and/or any experiences that would interfere with their ability to be
impartial. It is solely and only Hogan's responsibility to disclose this
information not anyone else's responsibility to pry it out of him like
some game show.
All these comments blaming the judge or Samsung's
lawyers because Hogan failed in his responsibility to disclose are
wrong. Hogan was required by the court to disclose this information and he
failed to do so -- accidentally or on purpose makes no difference. He knew (and
only he knew) of his bias and he did not disclose it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
