decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Please | 751 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Apache viewpoint on this - MS is not being the good guy
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 08:27 PM EDT
end result being Apache coding to completely IGNORE the flag EVEN IF activated
by an informed user. End result - user tracked, but Microsoft can say it was
NOT due to them! Bad move by Apache.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Please
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Friday, October 05 2012 @ 11:31 AM EDT
First, Microsoft is doing this to appear like the good guy. But it really
isn't.
Secondly, DNT is a joke. No advertiser is going to "voluntarily"
"not track" you if they can without getting fined or caught.
Thirdly, MS is creating it's own internal adtracker for the Windows OS.
So the only thing MS accomplishes by setting DNT to default on, is ... nothing.

So the take away here is: MS will now be tracking you more than ever, and if DNT
ever becomes mandatory for advertisers to honor, and I think MS is planning on
some legislation to head that way, then MS has a built into the OS ad system
that all other advertisers would need to pay MS to use. (#3. Profit!)

In other words MS is now in the Embrace and Extend stage. Classic MS MO.

It simply amazes me how people can still be so blind to Microsoft's blatant and
obvious (at least to me) habitual behavior. MS hasn't changed it's tactics in
the more than 30 years they've been in existence. You'd think people would find
them predictable by now.

Why all these folks are upset about DNT defaulting to "on" is just
silly. Why the standard defaults to off is equally silly. The logic for setting
the default sillier yet. Who thinks these things up a six year old in Tibet?
"Do not track me please", what a freaking joke! But maybe some of
them see MS taking a stance and saying, "Uh Oh! MS is up to something
eeevviiiilll again, but we don't know what it is. So we'd better attack
now."

In the mean time, when I don't want to be tracked I'll simply use TOR. Of
course, I'd really like to never be tracked ever, and have gone to a mostly cash
existence. Which is of course challenging today. but I'm easily tracked, since I
make a living with computers, and life has moved in a very-large-scale way to
Internet.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )