decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
P&G, Walmart, Over reaction? | 751 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
P&G, Walmart, Over reaction?
Authored by: LocoYokel on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 01:05 PM EDT
your data
This statement is completely backwards. It is NOT "your" data, it is their data "ABOUT" you, therefore you have no right to restrict their collection of it or subsequent use of it in any way. Just ask any corporation and they will tell you this is so.

/sarcasm

The only way to change that will be through legislative action and the adoption of EU style privacy laws. Good luck with that happening with the bribery lobbying system in DC.

---
Political correctness is an effort to abrogate the First
Amendment under the assumption that there exists a right to
not be offended and that it has priority

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

P&G, Walmart, Over reaction?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, October 05 2012 @ 10:44 PM EDT
You do not own information about you that is collected by other parties. You
can only control your reputation by your actions. Gossip and online data
collections systems will fly.

You can try to control the use of information about you through contract law.
But using legislation to control the distribution of information about you
collected by other people is unconstitutional. Its is protected first amendment
speech. You are trying to create privacy rights that do not exist. You are
inviting government in through the back door to take your Internet freedoms
away.

It is possible, technologically speaking, to engage in commerce online without
disclosing personal information. You can use third party agents so that you
never interact directly with the vendors that collect the information so there
is no opportunity to share you personal data with them.

There are now encrypted portals to the internet that hide your computer from the
websites you are visiting. Scouring your system of cookies removes most of the
local data from your browsing history.

The thing is that most people are lazy. Vigilance is the cost of freedom but
they want the freedom without having to work for it. The world doesn't work
that way. The way of freedom is to find and implement a solution ourselves.
The way of the law is the lazy way that leads to one compromise after another
until we have nothing left that we can call our own.

Have you thought about the consequences of not allowing data collection? People
work hard to improve their credit scores which are based what the world sees as
their personal histories.

You have the right to keep private what you do in private. What you do in
public is a matter of the public record. The Internet is not a private place,
it is a public place. Browsing a public website is no different than walking
around a shopping mall. Merchants have the right to notice what interests you
and to make offers to you based on their observations. If you do not like it
then stay off the Internet and go live in a cave.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )