decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
No Virginia, you have no duty to secure your wifi access point | 751 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
No Virginia, you have no duty to secure your wifi access point
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 09:40 AM EDT
I agree with you. It is sensible to try to secure it, realizing that absolute
security is impossible.
It is not sensible to mandate security.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No Virginia, you have no duty to secure your wifi access point
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 10:02 AM EDT
"My current router is secured with a MAC filter. Not especially secure,
I'll
admit, but it'll defeat most script kiddies - security by obscurity and all
that
... :-)"

You are kidding, right? They have scripts for that!

Being a script kiddie has never been better or easier.
Oh to be young again. ;-)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No Virginia, you have no duty to secure your wifi access point
Authored by: JamesK on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 12:02 PM EDT
Securing WiFi is easy. You simply have to enable WPA2 and use a decent
password. You shouldn't use WPA or WEP if you can avoid it, as both have been
compromised. In fact, WEP is essentially useless these days. Also, with
802.11n, WPA2 is mandatory, if encryption is used. I generally use 63 random
character passwords from www.grc.com.

---
The following program contains immature subject matter. Viewer discretion is
advised.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Secure your LAN *and* have open WiFi
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 01:23 PM EDT
I'm a big believer in using a router that supports multiple WiFi networks.

My network hides behind one with WPA2 to keep most people out. I only run Linux
and Mac's on this network, each with its own firewall policies.

I also run an open WiFi for guests or anyone outside who feels like stealing my
bandwidth.

No Windows PC's are allowed on my private network (not allowed in my house if I
can help it)

I get away with this because I live in a small neighborhood and don't do
anything crazy with my machines (no top secret materials to worry about). My
biggest concern is keeping viruses away and making it easy to use my machines.
Every once in a while I check the hosts on my router and make sure I can
identify all the MAC addresses and watch the bandwidth to make sure nothing too
bad is happening.

If I lived in an apartment building or in a busy city I'd do things completely
differently.. Maybe limit bandwidth on the public network :)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )