decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Breaking the law | 751 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Breaking the law
Authored by: tknarr on Friday, October 05 2012 @ 12:07 PM EDT

At least in the US there's regulations against "loss leaders", products advertised at ruinously low prices (below the cost to the merchant) to entice shoppers into the store. Loss leaders themselves aren't a violation, but their use solely to entice shoppers in with the intention of upselling those shoppers to a more expensive item once they're in the door, with no intention of actually selling the low-priced item at the advertised price, is against the rules and can get a merchant prosecuted. One of the key elements is that the merchant refuses to sell the loss-leader item at the advertised price even when a customer's prepared to buy and pay. It's considered a form of deceptive advertising and misrepresentation.

Of course, most commonly it's easy to spot because when you offer to pay the shop's always "out of stock" or the item's "on back-order" and an investigation shows that the shop either never ordered any or only had 1 or 2 in stock.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )