|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, October 03 2012 @ 06:54 PM EDT |
All the business with Hogan only happened AFTER the verdict.
If he said anything to anyone before then, he would be violating court orders
about not discussing the case prior to deliberations. I don't see how you can
conclude that, as a matter of course, one lawyer would discuss jurors with
another, unless the juror in question had been doing something to draw attention
to himself. Why else would this happen?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 08:04 PM EDT |
This is just another case, albeit a big one, that QE must be involved in at the
moment. Why would partners be discussing the jury of THIS case with their
spouses. Surely the jury is only of interest to the QE lawyers involved in THIS
case.
I didn't see that QE said that the spouse/partner of one of the lawyers/QE
partner involved in this case spotted the name, just that it was one of the QE
partners (does it even say they were from the same office?)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|