|
|
|
| Authored by: red floyd on Thursday, October 04 2012 @ 08:00 PM EDT |
Again, irrelevant.
The *IMPORTANT* point of lying during VD is his agreement to follow the law *AS
PROVIDED BY THE COURT* and not his own interpretation.
No amount of semantic juggling can reconcile his agreement during VD with his
own admitted behavior during deliberations.
---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, October 06 2012 @ 07:34 AM EDT |
I'm sorry, but even the question "have you ever had
children?" is straw man - because the social context of that
kind of question is completely incomparable. A question
about your children in day to day life implies an particular
kind of answer: i.e. when someone asks you if you have any
children they usually want to know how many.
Being questioned in a court of law by a Judge is NOT day to
day. There is no social experience a person can draw on to
interpret the intent of the question, hence the only fair
interpretation is the literal one.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
