|
|
|
| Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Monday, October 01 2012 @ 03:09 PM EDT |
Well that should be available pretty soon. I must have missed this in my first
skim through of the guidelines
"Unless the presiding judge deems otherwise, recordings of court
proceedings should be made publicly available within a few hours."
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 01 2012 @ 07:19 PM EDT |
It should be noted also, that it's only available for
certain Active Senior Judges. If the case is heard before a
Magistrate Judge, it won't be recorded.
And, while the video may be posted within 48 hours, the
judge can decide not to post it (or portions of it) at all.
Also the request must be made for EACH proceeding. Not one
request for the entire trial (and the requests must be made
at least 20 days prior).
From the "Cameras in the Courtroom" page:
Active and senior district judges in the Seattle division
are eligible to participate in the Pilot Program. The
following judges have agreed to participate: Chief Judge
Pechman, Judge Lasnik, Judge Martinez, Judge Robart, Judge
Jones, Judge Coughenour, and Judge Zilly. Proceedings before
a magistrate judge are not eligible to be video recorded.
Parties are provided an opportunity near the beginning of
the case to agree to participate in the Pilot Program. The
clerk will subsequently seek consent to video record each
scheduled proceeding.
Consent to video recording of one proceeding in a case will
not be construed as consent to record any other proceeding
in the case.
The presiding judge may decide not to make all or part of a
video recording available to the public.
From the page where you can make requests available:
After a proceeding is video recorded, it will be made
available to the public via the U.S. Courts Cameras in
Courts Video Player Website and this court's website,
generally within 48 hours. The presiding judge may decide
not to release all or part of the recording.
So, first, we need to know who the judge is. If it's one of
those listed, then this is certainly a possibility. If it's
a Magistrate Judge, then it's not possible.
Have a great day:)
Patrick.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 01 2012 @ 08:11 PM EDT |
Microsoft lives in the Land of Mordor Where the Shadows Lie. Wicked Evil Bright
Light hurttsss poor Smeagol's eyes, yessss preciousssss. It hurtss uss it does,
spies on ussss it doesss. Triksy light.
Still we should definitely try. Nothing ventured nothing gained. But I don't
need a Palantir to see where it will lead.
I'd now include some text in the Black Speech of Mordor, but I doubt Groklaw
supports that font and there are few now who can read it.
...In The Land of Mordor Where the Shadows Lie...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
