decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Apple v Samsung - What's New? Plus All The Preliminary Injunction Arguments (and I Do Mean All) ~pj | 94 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Apple v Samsung - What's New? Plus All The Preliminary Injunction Arguments (and I Do Mean All) ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, October 01 2012 @ 07:34 PM EDT
My dream is that, at some point, transparency can be
achieved. Honestly, I've heard (and believe) that the
average politician, for all their faults, would prefer
working for an intelligent, rational, and informed
electorate. Sadly, that electorate doesn't actually exist -
and probably won't.

Right now, realistically, it is reasonably difficult to get
a complete picture on any topic of legislation. So, your
average citizen, occupied with their own lives, can't and
won't vote in an informed fashion. (I mean - I'm not sure
about fracking's pluses and minuses and how to weigh
them...I have some idea - and think it probably is better
than coal...but could easily be wrong.)

There are 2 obvious things that need doing...
(a) Free the data (the easy bit): Lots of work to store
everything in open access databases. Honestly, the most
important data is probably economic - but even published
technical and scientific data tends to be difficult to
access. Oh, and create real incentives to report significant
illegality.
(b) Parse the data: Serious work on AI - to really create
and judge accurate pictures of reality. Not possible yet,
but maybe it will be someday. Or maybe figure out a good
way to incorporate human beings. There's always a lot of
room for disagreement, but many politicians spend a lot of
time trumpeting inaccuracies as truth.

Of course, even then, people will probably prefer listening
to Rush. Oh well - it'll help a bit.

--Erwin

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )