|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 30 2012 @ 01:22 PM EDT |
Apple would then argue that it couldn't possibly be non-infringing and should
also be covered by the injunction which should not be lifted.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: knarf on Monday, October 01 2012 @ 03:21 AM EDT |
I don't think they can. Any tablet which stands the chance of challenging
Apple's current offerings will be attacked as infringing on some patent or
other. They seem to have convinced themselves that they 'invented' the concept
and that it therefore by right is theirs. Worse, they seem to have convinced at
least part of the media, and with that a significant part of the general
populace, that where they tread magic happens and by corollary where others go
they probably followed in Apple's tracks.
---
[ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: DannyB on Monday, October 01 2012 @ 11:52 AM EDT |
If a product, any kind of product, competes with Apple, then how can it be
non-infringing?
---
The price of freedom is eternal litigation.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
