|
| Authored by: Yossarian on Friday, September 28 2012 @ 07:49 PM EDT |
Why to invent when you can just patent somebody's else
inventions and then have the US court system impose heavy
sanctions on them?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: MadTom1999 on Saturday, September 29 2012 @ 03:34 AM EDT |
I'm wondering about starting a ProGroklaw - that’s short for Profanity allowed
Groklaw as I'm running short of small animals to vent my anger on at Apples
antics.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 29 2012 @ 04:50 AM EDT |
1) wait for innovative company to invent technology X and
patent the method.
2) patent use cases of technology X
3) sue everyone
4) $$$$
It's actually quite clever, I wonder if anyone has patented
this business model.
(This post is now one (of many) examples of prior art on
this, so don't even think about it trolls)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 29 2012 @ 10:37 AM EDT |
I remember reading in 2002-2003 the reason for the development of OLED screens
was because of their flexibility and could be placed on curved surfaces. Apple
is attempting to monopolize OLED technology on all electronic devices.
stage_v
from under the bridge [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
