Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

You seem to have somehow answered my rant above whilst I was typing it | 183 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

You seem to have somehow answered my rant above whilst I was typing it

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 29 2012 @ 07:43 AM EDT

May I see your time machine please?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't think this is about being able to actually sell the tab

Authored by: squib on Saturday, September 29 2012 @ 11:33 AM EDT

If I get the gist of this post right. When a manufacturer provides a wide choice
of different devises for different sectors of the market, one of them is bound
to be similar to what apple has chosen too!
And whilst apple spent loads of dosh on market research for their ultimate
offering, Samsung just churned out loads of different models in order to
discover what <i>'the people' </i>wanted. This must have surely cost
Samsung more and required them to take more business risks than apple. We get
back to who is doing the real innovation. (writing this on a MacBook).

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not just one right choice - Authored by: stegu on Sunday, September 30 2012 @ 06:00 AM EDT
Innovation? - Authored by: cricketjeff on Sunday, September 30 2012 @ 08:46 AM EDT
I don't think this is about being able to actually sell the tab - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 30 2012 @ 03:48 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )