|
|
|
| Authored by: webster on Thursday, September 27 2012 @ 08:54 AM EDT |
.
Consider it a fact. Given what is at stake, --a
billion dollars and a long stride toward monopoly,
Apple would be remiss not to.
The foreman should shut up and lawyer up to get
immunity for any false or misleading statements. It
is always true that anything you say can be used
against you. Silence is your friend.
.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, September 27 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT |
The fact that Apple got Samsung sanctioned for not keeping potential evidence
when they themselves *AS PLAINTIFF* (and so OUGHT to know when litigation would
start) did not start keeping the same data until after Samsung did (and much
after at that) says it all:
Every time I now hear Apple [loudly] accusing Samsung of doing anything
[illegal], my immediate thought [and suspicion with a very high probability of
being accurate] is that Apple have done it themselves.
So for Apple to accuse Samsung of contacting jurors immediately tells me it is
highly probable (near certainty based on past evidence) that Apple has.
Once you learn how a magician does misdirection, it is hard for that magician to
wow you with their tricks as you'll be looking in the wrong place [from their
point of view].[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
