Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 06:44 PM EDT |
The link labeled 2002 is actually a link to 2001. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 07:26 PM EDT |
The link for "2002" actually links to doc 2001 :( [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Corrections - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 07:32 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 08:28 PM EDT |
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 08:44 PM EDT |
Just thinking PJ or MW might want to make that clearer. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: JonCB on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 09:52 PM EDT |
The OCR of the Thomson Reuter link (marked (Sabri Decl. Ex.
B)) should actually be :-
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/ViewNews.a
spx?id=57594&terms=%40ReutersTopicCodes+CONTAINS+%27ANV%27[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: nsomos on Thursday, September 27 2012 @ 12:00 PM EDT |
There is a stray line number (18) that slipped in
Apple's opposition motion re contacting the jury, as text:
Samsung is seeking to preclude 18 Apple
should be
Samsung is seeking to preclude Apple[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|