decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Trust | 214 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Summary of the 'ideas' in the memo
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 10:12 AM EDT
* "Knowingly providing hyperlinks on websites to terrorist content must be defined by law as illegal just like the terrorist content itself"
* "Governments must disseminate lists of illegal, terrorist websites"
* "The Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 (art 1.2) should be explained that providing Internet services is included in providing economics instruments to Al Qaeda (and other terrorist persons and organisations designated by the EU) and therefore an illegal act"
* "On Voice over IP services it must be possible to flag users for terrorist activity."
* "Internet companies must allow only real, common names."
* "Social media companies must allow only real pictures of users."
* "At the European level a browser or operating system based reporting button must be developed."
* "Governments will start drafting legislation that will make offering... a system [to monitor Internet activity] to Internet users obligatory for browser or operating systems...as a condition of selling their products in this country or the European Union."
Cyrus Farivar, ars technica

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

compare the public document with the private document
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 10:21 AM EDT
PUBLIC [.DOC]
http://www.cleanitproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/CLEAN-IT-DRAFT-DOCUMENT- 066Pub.doc

PRIVATE [.PDF]
http://www.edri.org/files/cleanIT_sept2012.pdf

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Lost for words.
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 11:14 AM EDT
Idiots, all of them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Standard technique - at least in Europe
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 03:30 PM EDT
'Leak' all sorts of lunacies and see, from the reactions, what you can actually
get away with.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Terrorism is a four letter word
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 03:45 PM EDT
Having accepted that the war against smut is unwinnable,
the poobahs have found something else to hang their flag on.
It's sad that the human need to explain the unexplainable
should lead to suppression of explanations.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Trust
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 04:02 PM EDT
>>"We really didn’t expect that people would publish
a document that clearly says ‘not for publication’—that
really surprised us," he said. "I don’t know if it’s naive.
Why can’t I trust people?"<< But Klaas.

Interesting dilemma, if everybody could be trusted,
there would be no need for documents like this.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )