|
|
|
| Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 03:50 PM EDT |
Obviously there should be no punishment if all what happened
was what is publicly known.
Now, I wonder, if a juror knowingly received goods or favors
in exchange for a favorable verdict, would that be enough to
make him punishable by the law? This is completely
hypothetical by the way, and in no way related to the actions
in this trial.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: LocoYokel on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 07:49 PM EDT |
and it's the worst possible kind of punishment for someone like him.
He has been publicly called out on his actions and called incompetent. For a
person who places a high value on being seen as an expert and knowledgeable like
he seems to be that is one of the worst things that can happen. That is the
reason for the statements like "There was no misconduct", he cannot
tolerate being questioned and being found in the wrong.
Think about other people you know who are like this, do they also not behave in
a similar manner when shown to be wrong?
---
Political correctness is an effort to abrogate the First
Amendment under the assumption that there exists a right to
not be offended and that it has priority[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, September 26 2012 @ 09:22 PM EDT |
Telling him in no uncertain terms that he failed to keep his promises...Then
sending him out...
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
