|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 01:07 PM EDT |
When discussions started the Majority of the Jury was for no fault at all on the
truck drivers part after all his vehicle did not swerve in front of her. It was
a normal lane change. But the Jury Foreman convinced everyone That it was a big
company that could afford to pay, That no one knew what might show up in the
future that was a result of this wreck. An ambulance did transport the lady to
the hospital, but she was released less than 40 minutes after she arrived at the
hospital. Her only witness was a chiropractor who could not testify to any
specific injury, but general "soft tissue damages can occur"
They did not need my vote in a civil trial. So my opinion was out voted. There
were lots of nurses and doctors in the jury pool that the lady's attorney used
their challenges to eliminate, leave me on as an engineer.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- clarification? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 01:11 PM EDT
- clarification? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 01:24 PM EDT
- Thank you. - Authored by: mcinsand on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 02:18 PM EDT
|
|
|
|
