Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

I think this Judge will push on through regardless. | 458 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

I think this Judge will push on through regardless.

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 11:08 AM EDT

It's nearly impossible at this time to be in the markets and not be in AAPL.
Over 400 funds have it as their major holdings. Extremely crowded trade
(traders will know what I mean there) and a drop in AAPL will cause a rush for
the crowded exit ramp and a buncha people are gonna feel real hurt about it.

So blind trust or not - most of that type money managers invest in
"funds" which in turn, all own AAPL, or nearly.
They don't trade like a retail trader (me) does at all.

In fact, I feel the time is near for an epic short on AAPL that'll be nearly as
good as going long was under 100. Maybe not today, but real soon. They've lost
it, and the perception is growing among the less well informed.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Protecting pensioners ... - Authored by: Wol on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 01:11 PM EDT
- Protecting pensioners ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 08:14 PM EDT
- We are limited. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 08:38 PM EDT
  - but that's as it should be. - Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 09:11 AM EDT
    - but that's as it should be. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 11:26 AM EDT
    - The issue with individual shares is risk. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 02:48 PM EDT
      - The issue with individual shares is risk. - Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 07:04 PM EDT
        The issue with individual shares is risk. - Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, September 25 2012 @ 07:06 PM EDT
I think this Judge will push on through regardless. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT
- I think this Judge will push on through regardless. - Authored by: Wol on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 07:56 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )