Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 09:49 PM EDT |
If so, this could give the judge a face-saving way out. She is unlikely to want
to
grant a retrial based on her own unfairness, but may be concerned that if the
case was taken to a higher court it could declare her trial unfair and do so
very
publicly. If she was to grant a retrial based on jury misconduct, wouldn't that
keep her own conduct from being publicly scrutinised by a higher court?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 11:54 PM EDT |
Missed the pages 1 & 2. Are there any exihibits?
I would expect the videos to be filed if they made the
motion. Also are any of the case citations involving juror
misconduct?
I can see why that particular motion might be redacted. OTOH
I don't see it as being absolutely necessary.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Juror misconduct. - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 23 2012 @ 03:42 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 23 2012 @ 05:46 AM EDT |
No one mentioned before, nor anywhere on the net, but the
patent guru juror said something absolutely hilarious/shocking.
He claimed that they believe Samsung willfully copied Apple
BECAUSE the video deposition of some Korean manager, and how
they where evasive and/or not very persuasive.
But can be a weak oral performance - not traduced by another
high profile manager with deep cultural background- accepted
as a PROOF ????
It show only two thing: the juror is a dumbass and that they
needed something for prove the case, cause in the courtroom
they got nothing. Like :.. we know they are guilty, but how
to prove?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|