|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 23 2012 @ 04:25 AM EDT |
At the moment I will not refer to the foreman by name, I
will point out that this post is highly speculative and
everything I say here may be compete and utter BS. Until we
know for sure one way or another we should not assume anyone
did anything wrong.
Having said that the fact that the foreman is cited in two
legal actions: ( and in one case they use his full name, in
the other his last name is only mentioned, but the case is
in his municipality ), one where he is sued by Seagate, the
other a bankrupcy proceeding approximately six months later.
That there is one other case involving a juror making false
statements during voir dire; is highly suggestive that the
foreman made such statements. That Samsung has done us one
better and moved the question of possible jury misconduct
from one in a vague and murky legal setting to one where the
question is much clearer.
I also want to suggest that people who suggested that
Samsung conducted improper voir dire, may owe Samsung ( or
rather Quinn et al ) an apology.
Mouse The Lucky Dog[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
