Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

I'm not so sure | 211 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

What about addressing the same judge?

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 08:39 PM EDT

But if they don't raise it here, they will not be able to
raise it on appeal.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What about addressing the same judge?

Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 08:52 PM EDT

I agree that is very difficult to get a judge to admit that
they conducted a bad trial. I hope all of this stuff is
appeal-able to another court.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What about addressing the same judge? - Authored by: PJ on Saturday, September 22 2012 @ 09:11 PM EDT

I'm not so sure

Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, September 23 2012 @ 06:31 AM EDT

IIRC she repeatedly warned both parties to settle or face
unpleasantness.

I think she may have anticipated a less one sided result
with both sides paying a heavy price for wasting her time on
something that could have been settled before trial.

I think she may be wondering what can be done at this point
to correct things, and this motion gives her a *lot* of
options.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )